Develop a Physical Security Assessment

1-1

Objective: Learn how to build and execute a structured, actionable security assessment plan that identifies critical assets, evaluates risk, and aligns with organizational goals.

🔍 Why It Matters

Developing a physical security assessment is a foundational task for any security professional. Whether you're protecting a corporate headquarters, data center, healthcare facility, or utility infrastructure, knowing what you’re protecting and how to assess the risks to those assets is essential. This process is central to risk-informed decision-making, regulatory compliance, and strategic security planning.

📌 Key Knowledge Areas

  • Identifying key areas or critical assets
  • Selecting appropriate risk assessment models
  • Applying qualitative and quantitative assessment methods
  • Organizing resources, stakeholders, and standards to support the assessment

📐 Choosing the Right Risk Assessment Model

🏢 Identifying Critical Assets

Before assessing risks, you must identify what matters most. A critical asset is anything—tangible or intangible—that is essential to your organization's mission. This includes people, property, technology, information systems, brand reputation, or operational continuity.

 

Techniques to Identify Critical Assets:

  • Analyze organizational charts and workflows
  • Conduct interviews with department heads and asset owners
  • Perform a Business Impact Analysis (BIA)
  • Review incident history and loss events
  • Include diverse perspectives (e.g., IT, legal, HR, operations)

Asset Value Considerations:

  • Replacement cost and recovery effort
  • Business interruption impact
  • Legal and compliance exposure
  • Reputational consequences

Understanding asset criticality helps prioritize protection efforts and determine acceptable risk levels.

A strong security assessment must be built on a reliable framework. The following four models offer different perspectives and should be chosen based on facility type, threat landscape, and operational context:

 

🔄 Outside-Inward Assessment

Simulates adversary tactics by evaluating the site from the perimeter inward. Ideal for testing breach potential and intrusion pathways.

 

🛡️ Inside-Outward Assessment

Focuses on defending the most critical assets at the core and assessing outward protective layers. This method aligns well with business continuity goals.

 

📍 Site-Specific Assessment

Tailors the assessment to a facility’s unique location, purpose, history, and environmental risks. It integrates local crime data, access conditions, and regulatory obligations.

 

⚙️ Functional or Discipline-Specific Approach

Breaks the facility into security domains (e.g., access control, video surveillance, CPTED) and evaluates each independently before integrating findings.

📊 Qualitative vs. Quantitative Assessment Methods

Security professionals use both qualitative and quantitative tools to measure and visualize risk.

  • Qualitative methods rely on expert judgment, interviews, and descriptors like "High/Medium/Low." These are useful for fast assessments or when data is limited.
  • Quantitative methods use numeric values for asset value, threat probability, and vulnerability severity. These support ROI analysis, cost justification, and modeling.
  • Blended approaches are common and recommended. For example, use a risk matrix to visualize the intersection of likelihood and impact.

Tip: Use well-defined scales and document your assumptions for consistency and clarity.

🛠️ Resources and Guidelines for Effective Assessments

To ensure a comprehensive and defensible assessment, you’ll need the right mix of people, tools, and frameworks:

 

👥 Stakeholders:

  • Security leadership
  • Facility management
  • IT, HR, Legal, and Operations
  • External consultants if needed

💵 Budget Planning:

  • Time for assessments and interviews
  • Equipment (e.g., meters, tablets, PPE)
  • Software (e.g., risk matrix tools, GIS, audit platforms)
  • Consulting services

📂 Tools & Documentation:

  • Site drawings, floor plans, and schematics
  • Security logs, access records, and incident reports
  • Cameras, measuring tools, and field notes

📚 Standards and Best Practices:

  • ASIS General Security Risk Assessment Guideline
  • NFPA 730/731 – Premises Security Standards
  • FEMA Risk Management Series
  • ISO 31000 / 22301 for Risk and Continuity Management
  • Internal SOPs and industry-specific compliance requirements

✅ Summary Checklist

🧠 Pro Tip for PSP Candidates

🎓 Ready to Advance?

Expect the PSP exam to test your understanding of risk models, terminology, and assessment planning. You should be able to justify model selection, interpret criticality, and distinguish between qualitative vs. quantitative findings.

Developing a physical security assessment plan is not just a test topic—it’s a real-world skill that lays the groundwork for all protective strategies. Use it to align your security posture with business needs, gain stakeholder support, and deliver measurable value to your organization.

DOMAIN 1 - TASK 1

© Copyright. All rights reserved.
Legal Notice | Privacy Policy 

We need your consent to load the translations

We use a third-party service to translate the website content that may collect data about your activity. Please review the details in the privacy policy and accept the service to view the translations.